Ethanol Giant Shifts To BioFuel

Posted By Lin on January 12, 2010

Fagen Inc, the company that has built more ethanol plants than any other company in the world, is changing focus. The Granite Falls company announced on January 3, 2009 that the company will now focus 60% on biomass, 25% on wind energy, and the remaining 15% on other types of industrial facilities.

Fagen is beginning construction this month of the largest biomass power plant in the US. The 100 megawatt plant will serve the Austin Texas area, using wood waste from wood processing plants as a fuel source instead of coal.

EPA Stuff and The Environment Video Contest

Posted By Lin on January 4, 2010

The EPA is sponsoring a video contest entitled “Our Planet, Our Stuff, Our Choice” with a theme of “Individual Action In Your Community”, about how the stuff you use every day impacts your environment, your community, and the planet. They want to see the impact of your actions to help the environment, with a focus on your stories, your ideas, and your actions.

Videos must be 30 or 60 seconds in length and follow the guidelines listed on the EPA website at www.epa.gov/waste/wycd/video.htm.

Videos must be themed on one or more of the following topics:

  1. Recycling
  2. Composting
  3. Reuse / Reduce
  4. Reducing Your Consumption and Environmental Footprint
  5. Buying Green

The top prize is $2,500 and having your video featured on the EPA website. There are four other prizes as well. Entries must be received or postmarked by February 16, 2009.

More information is available on the YouTube video at www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5K7T8B7wok.

If you’d like to learn more about “stuff” and what it does to our world, visit the Story of Stuff at www.storyofstuff.com/.

The Direct Hazard of Atrazine

Posted By Lin on September 5, 2009

Atrazine is a widely used herbicide that is banned by the European Union due to its persistent groundwater contamination1 but is widely used in the United States, to the tune of 77 million pounds in 2003 alone. It is used to stop pre- and post-emergent broadleaf weeds.

How does this affect me, you might ask? Because atrazine is so widely used, it penetrates groundwater and enters underground aquifers. It also contaminates runoff into lakes and streams. Since most communities and cities use one of these sources to provide drinking water, this will eventually lead to serious problems.

The Natural Resource Defense Council has published a recent report2 entitled “Poisoning the Well” that includes a map of known regional atrazine concentrations, but the NRDC report does not take into account the potential impact of aquifiers. Most people assume “well water” is a local phenomenon, but in fact water may travel hundreds of miles underground. In the Twin Cities of Minnesota, for instance, local communities all draw their water from part of the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifier3,4, which stretches from Michigan to Indiana to Missouri to northeastern Minnesota. In many cases, metropolitan wells pull water from dozens if not hundreds of miles away. This means that the water you drink in Edina MN may be coming from farmland in southern Minnesota.

The Environmental Protection Agency claims that atrazine poses no threat to humans, in spite of the fact that, as a study by the  Soil / Water / Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE)5 states, atrazine has been shown to cause serious adverse health effects in humans including but not limited to cancer of the prostate, breasts, ovaries and and stomach, tumors, and non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Research suggests that atrazine primarily targets the reproductive system and developing organisms.

Part of the reason that the EPA claims that there is no problem is because they measure atrazine only once every 90 days. The half-life of atrazine in the soil is 13-261 days1, depending on soil composition and other factors. This means that much of the chemical can break down before the EPA measures it, particularly since it is not applied every day, but at intervals. As an example, the NRDC discovered that Little Pigeon Creek in Indiana2, the annual average atrazine concentration was 18.56 ppb, but the maximum concentration was 237.5 ppb! At a mere 1 ppb, atrazine begins negatively impacting plant life. One study by researchers at Purdue University, published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, suggests concentrations as small as 0.1 parts per billion may be associated with low birth weights.6

Furthermore, the breakdown chemicals would not be specifically register as atrazine in EPA tests. This does not mean that the impact from atrazine simply vanishes. Instead, atrazine breaks down via one of two processes, both of which result in the production of cyanuric acid1,7, one of the key chemicals that appeared during the 2007 pet food scandal and the 2008 Chinese milk scandal that affected children in China8. When cyanuric acid binds with melamine it can potentially cause kidney failure and death. According to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency9, total residues of atrazine plus its metabolites may exceed atrazine regulatory limits even though atrazine does not.

Another point to consider is that the EPA secretly negotiated2 with the manufacturer of atrazine – Syngenta – to only monitor 40 watersheds out of over 1,000 at-risk watersheds, meaning that their coverage is spotty at best. Out of these 40, all showed detectable levels of atrazine.

The US Geologic Survey office recently added an online tool10 to see current atrazine concentrations in streams.

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atrazine

2. http://www.nrdc.org/health/atrazine/files/atrazine.pdf

3. http://pubs.usgs.gov/ha/ha730/pub/ch_a/Apg10.pdf  

4. http://pubs.usgs.gov/ha/ha730/pub/ch_a/Apg11.pdf

5. http://ngwa.confex.com/ngwa/2009gws/webprogram/Paper5947.html

6. http://aquadoc.typepad.com/waterwired/2009/08/how-much-atrazine-is-safe-in-your-water-glass.html

7. http://umbbd.msi.umn.edu/atr/atr_map.html

8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyanuric_acid

9. http://www.cababstractsplus.org/abstracts/Abstract.aspx?AcNo=19912313464

10. http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=2292

 

Are CFLs a Good Investment?

Posted By Lin on March 28, 2009

In general, the answer is yes. Most CFLs are a significant improvement over current incandescent and fluorescent bulbs, both in duration and environmental impact. As with any new technology, there are some issues, but most of these will be overcome with time. Consumer Reports recommends several bulbs for their lower mercury content and extended life.

As with any product for which someone can gain advantage by disparaging the product, there is no shortage of detractors. One of the most common topics brought up has to do with the mercury in the bulbs. Mercury is a serious contaminant, but there are many aspects of mercury that most people don’t know about, such as the fact that there are several types of mercury, that some are less harmful than others, and that CFL bulbs are less risky than eating high-mercury fish such as white tuna and Chilean Sea Bass. In fact, new CFL bulbs now often contain less than 5 ppm of mercury, most of which dissipates quickly into the air if the bulb is broken.

Does this mean that CFL bulbs are the best solution? Not any more. New LED bulbs, particularly those that replace fluorescent ‘tube’ lights and specialty incandescent bulbs such as can lights, typically last 30,000-50,000 hours, are priced reasonably, have equal or greater lumens, and fit into existing sockets. Businesses in particular can benefit from these super long lasting bulbs, reducing labor costs for bulb replacement to one fifteenth or less of current costs.

Energy Efficient Roofing

Posted By Lin on March 17, 2009

Owners of flat and low slope roofs can improve their energy efficiency, decrease roofing and energy costs, and extend the life of their roof with spray polyurethane foam (SPF) roofing systems. SPF roofs provide a leak-free seal over your entire roof with strong adhesion and wind uplift resistance.

SPF roofs also have high r-value, high solar reflectance and low thermal admittance, meaning they a great insulators. They last longer than most other roofing types and have a low maintenance cost.

If you ever do need to remove an SPF roof, the roofing material can be run through a special machine to shred it and transform it into foam for internal building insulation.

One company on the cutting edge of installations with this material is Kohls Foam Systems. Kohls is currently in the process of assembling low interest rate financing that can enable you to repair an entire roof at little or no up-front cost. Their website is loaded with information about SPF roofing.

Another source for information on SPF roofing is www.sprayfoam.com.

Twin Cities Sustainable Communities Conference

Posted By Lin on March 11, 2009

The Twin Cities Sustainable Communities Conference will be held next Thursday at the Paul & Sheila Wellstone Center for Community in St. Paul, 179 Robie Street East, St. Paul, MN 55107.
This is actually two conferences in one. The first runs from 1 PM to 6 PM and is the “Local Government Sustainability Conference”. Attendance is $25. The second is from 4:45 PM to 9:30 PM and is the “Neighborhood Sustainability Conference”. This conference is free. Registration online is required for both conferences.

http://www.afors.org

DSIRE Energy Rebates and Incentives

Posted By Lin on March 11, 2009

In my last post I mentioned energy incentives as one way to help fund green energy projects. A great place to discover what incentives may be available to you is the DSIRE website at www.dsireusa.org. The DSIRE website appears with a map on the home page. You can click on your state to get a list of incentives, exemptions, and rebates as well as documents on rules and regulations. There is also a list of resources on the left side of the site.

(Please note, the DSIRE website appears with a map on the home page and the word USA in the website address. If you forget this and go to dsire.org instead, you will encounter a scam site designed to get you to click on ad links. This site also tries to install software on your computer. Exit it immediately.)

Unique Innovations Green Technologies

Posted By Lin on March 9, 2009

A startup in the clean green technology arena is starting to make some ripples. Unique Innovations is offering a suite of products to businesses and government entities designed to help make our world cleaner, greener, and cost less. Launched in 2008, the company is working with a number of players in the green energy field, such as Duke Energy, Gulf Coast Energy, Virchow Krause, and Project Solutions Group.

They currently offer products for LED lighting, fuel economy and fleet economy. Wastewater and oil spill reclamation, facility energy management, fire control, and green lubricants, but CEO Hardy DeLay assures me that this will be just the tip of the iceberg.

Many of their products are offered at little or no cost to businesses and governmental organizations through a blend of funding and incentive programs.

UI offers not only products, they also do consulting and have plans to offer training on green initiatives, environmental impacts, and how companies and individuals can help the environment.

www.uisminc.com

Clean Coal

Posted By Lin on March 6, 2009

The constant ongoing advertising bombardment about “clean coal” is beyond ridiculous. Known as integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) generators, there are a whopping 2 plants using this technology in use in the United States. And while these technologies can reduce the impact of burning coal, they do nothing about the environmental, economic and social impact of ripping the tops off mountains and dumping the toxic debris into nearby valleys, contaminating water supplies, destroying habitats, annihilating fisheries, and destroying forests. Not harvesting, but destroying.
Proponents of this devastation claim that the cost of coal is cheap, that alternative energies can never compete. Well, if solar or wind had the $3.2 billion dollars in government subsidies that the coal industry received in 2007, they’d be able to drive down the price of alternative energy to unbelievably low prices too, and the coal industry receives similar subsidies every year.
On the other end of the process is what to do with all that carbon extracted from the coal stacks. That is a critical part of “clean” coal. Unfortunately, there is no process in place to effectively manage this either. The only two techniques under practical discussion are to sequester the carbon deep in the earth or deep in the oceans.
Clean coal technology may be possible at some point, but not yet.
www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/Mining-the-Mountain.html
http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/29/the-enduring-allure-of-clean-coal/
www.onearth.org/article/debunking-the-myth-of-clean-coal
www.nytimes.com/2008/02/03/weekinreview/03revk.html?_r=1

Team Nevada and Alternative Energy

Posted By Lin on March 2, 2009

Nevada Energy and the Nevada Commission on Economic Development are leading “Team Nevada”, is designed to attract alternative energy industry players to Nevada. The press release states that the formal announcement of the public-private initiative is scheduled for the “Las Vegas Global Expo” on March 10-12, 2009.
Team Nevada is another example of the growing awareness of today’s environmental and economic climate.
For more information, here is the press release:

www.expand2nevada.com/documents/Team Nevada.pdf

Please note that there is no such event as the “Las Vegas Global Expo” The actual event is the Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America.

Here is the website.